by Susanne Dietze
I was just a girl when Lady Di married Prince Charles--and oh, how she made an impression on me. She was lovely, charming, flawed, and despite some of her questionable choices, I never quite got over her. Or the rest of her Windsor relations.
|I still have my paper dolls!|
The name of the exhibit is a little misleading. It's not all about Diana; in fact, the exhibit's opening rooms ground the visitor in Windsor history, starting with the abdication of Edward VIII. You may recall he abdicated so he could marry his divorced American love, Wallis Simpson.
Via original newspaper articles and timelines to give the visitor a sense of time and place, one follows history as one walks through the exhibit at one's own pace to view thousands of interesting items (some personal, including letters, clothing, and photographs; some not, including collections of Diana dolls, replicas of tiaras and wedding bouquets, books written by Prince Charles, and commemorative plates) relevant to just about every other member of the Royal Family through to Kate Middleton, Duchess of Cambridge, and adorable Prince George.
No wonder the whole family is included, really. The ship is the Queen Mary, who was the mother of Edward VIII and George VI, Queen Elizabeth's father.
Alas, no photos are allowed inside the exhibit. Double Alas, there is no guide book available, so I cannot direct you to a place where you can experience the exhibit without being there. The best I can do is share a few things I saw and this handy dandy, 30-second Youtube video:
Needless to say, I loved the exhibit. And it broke my heart. There's something about being right in front of something personal to a historic figure that makes her real to you in a way you can't imagine.
For instance, King George VI, Queen Elizabeth's dad, was one slender man. His coronation robe is on display (a cream-colored jacket with padded shoulders, worn under the robes of state), and while it is an amazing piece of embroidered craftsmanship, I couldn't get over how lean the guy was. Most men I know could not wear that robe. Probably not even Colin Firth, who played him in The King's Speech. (You can find a photo of it on this blog. As I said earlier, photos weren't allowed and others I found online are under copyright, so I'm playing it safe.)
Also thin? Wallis Simpson, later the Duchess of Windsor. Her pink negligee is on display. (Isn't it creepy to think your nightclothes might someday be ogled by thousands?) It is sheer and there's nowhere to hide a muffin top in that thing.
|Wallis' negligee, Taken from Pinterest via the Washington Times|
None of the Queen's or Queen Mother's clothes are on exhibit, but other mementos are on view, including letters. I loved peeking at the royal family's Christmas cards. Each one I saw had a photo on one side and a printed message on the other, signed by one or both members of a royal couple. Oddly, Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip's card from 1978 shows them posing with three corgis, but none of their unmarried children. I believe Prince Andrew and Prince Edward were teenagers at the time, still clearly in the royal nest. Hmm.
Speaking of those princes, I learned their wives each had two wedding gowns made. This was done so if something happened to one dress, another was ready for the Big Day. Sarah Ferguson, Andrew's bride, and Sophie, Edward's bride, befell no trauma to their gowns, leaving us the distinct pleasure of being able to view their backup gowns. They are not copies, but rather identical twins, created by the designers of the same fabric and embellishments at the same time.
Both gowns surprised me. I knew when Fergie married her gown was embroidered with bees, thistles, the letter "A" and hearts, but on TV I couldn't see the details, nor could I make them out in photos. Now I wonder how I missed them: the embroidery is a dark silver-gray and quite a stark contrast to the ivory of her gown. (Due to copyright issues, I can't include a photo, but you can view a replica here to see what I mean about the embroidery.)
Other observations? Prince Charles signs his name in such a way that in some of his letters, I couldn't tell it was Charles. Here's a link; scroll down to his signature, but this one definitely is more readable than some I saw. His wife Camilla has better penmanship, at least when signing Christmas cards.
Kate Middleton could probably fit into Wallis Simpson's clothes, if one judges by looking at her dresses on display. While the exhibit contains a replica of the "Blue Dress" she wore to announce her engagement, other dresses are original, including "The Dress" she wore when William first laid eyes on her, a sparkly, er, ensemble/tube/swimsuit cover-up she modeled. I believe this dress later sold at auction for a hundred thousand pounds. Replicas are on sale in the gift shop for over $200.
|Nope, can't wear this to church.|
|The gift shop--where I did not buy a single thing! Honest!|
What the article didn't say is Diana had a hairdresser appointment at least 50% of the mornings during any given month, sometimes more often. I am confident Kate, Duchess of Cambridge, also has significant hair support. Remember that "casual" first photo of Will, Kate, and baby George, taken by her father? She had two people work on her hair for that casual shot.
Not that I'm judging. I wish I had somebody to do my hair for me.
But back to Diana.
Several of her gowns are on display, currently owned by various individuals and purchased at auction (before her death, Diana donated many ensembles for charity). Sigh. Just lovely, and I remembered most of them.
Diana's wedding gown, as well as her jewelry and other items, belong to her sons and are not part of the exhibition. Her famous wedding gown used to be on exhibit on her brother's estate, Althorp, where she is buried, but the exhibit closed a year ago.
I left feeling a little sad. I couldn't help wondering how some of the objects came to be included. Clearly, Diana gave away Charles' gifts for some obvious reasons, but the other items in the exhibition were sold--sometimes by people who needed the cash (as in the case of the wedding invitation). What would it be like, to write letters or invite a friend to my wedding, and then have those things sold at auction? I stood in front of each of her gowns and wished things had turned out differently for their original owner. I wondered, what if she'd known Jesus?
Fortunately, I had something to cheer me up: a nice tea.
|Uh oh, that's caviar on the salmon.|
The tea shop is located next to the exhibit, and the mango chicken salad sandwiches were fabulous. I wouldn't mind another right now.
If I get the recipe, I'll let you know. Until then, I'll be washing my hair at least every other day without fail.
What about you? Do you enjoy Royal Watching?
Tea and a Good Book.
Susanne Dietze thinks Prince George is absolutely adorable. Her novella, Love's Reward, will be part of Barbour's Most Eligible Bachelor Collection, coming in 2015. You can visit her on her website, www.susannedietze.com
What a great post, Susie. And just in time for the big royal announcement. I would love to go on this tour. I think I'd like my own hair crew.ReplyDelete
I know! What timing! I am so happy about a new royal baby to admire. George is just adorable.ReplyDelete
I'd love my own hair crew. They'd have their jobs cut out for them this morning, though--bad hair day!
For $200, you should have bought one of those, er, garments and modeled it for Inkwell readers. Hey, it would be tax deductible since it would be a business expense. And think of all the hits the blog would have gotten!ReplyDelete
Looks like you had a lot of fun at the exhibit, and Suzie's right--you done good on the timing!
If I modeled that dress, I would have ended up in a Facebook meme on what not to wear! Let's just say it's not my color and move on. :)Delete
The exhibit was really fun for me. Wish I'd had more time to read every little word on every placard.
Love this Susie!! Wish I could have gone!! SusanReplyDelete
I wish you could've come with me, Susan!Delete
Susie, this sounds like a fabulous outing. I'm so glad you had a chance to see it.ReplyDelete
But a permanent display on a ship? What exactly does that mean? That it's a permanent part of the ship as it sails? Or that the ship is permanently moored in LA?
The Queen Mary is permanently docked in Long Beach, California. It is used as a tourist attraction, hotel and convention center now, but it has a fascinating history worthy of several blog posts!Delete
I don't know how permanent the exhibition is, but it's been there for over a year. I didn't know about it until recently, however!
Google doesn't like me today.ReplyDelete
The idea of my sleepwear going on public display is terrifying. #noonewantstoseethat
I know--the idea is mortifying. How do these things happen? I guess the lesson here is if you're famous, instruct your heirs to burn your underwear.Delete
We need a "like" button on here.Delete
I guess the moral of the story is that we all need to buy nicer underwear?ReplyDelete
Or not die...Delete
I am a closet Royal watcher since the death of Diana. I remember all the hoopla around her marriage but, as a tomboy, not all that interested in Princesses. The end of her marriage and death got me a bit interested in her sons because of their loss - so now I watch them with interest. Prince George is such a cutie (how can he not be, with the attendants available?)ReplyDelete
Interesting post. One doesn't think of Royals as being all that small or trim in general. Cool post!!